Legislature(1995 - 1996)
04/19/1996 01:35 PM Senate STA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 314 RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE OWNERSHIP
Number 130
CHAIRMAN SHARP brought up SB 314 as the next order of business
before the Senate State Affairs Committee. He asked the bill
drafter to review SB 314, "G" version.
Number 314
MIKE FORD, Attorney, Legislative Legal Services, reviewed the bill
by section.
Section 1: applies to brewery licenses; would reduce the amount
that a brewery could sell to a person present on the premises from
5 to 2.5 gallons. It would make a corresponding change on line 8
to be consistent with line 6.
Section 2: makes corresponding changes so that a brew-pub licensee
would have the same benefits that the brewery has, as far as sale
of beer manufactured on the premises and sampling.
Sections 3 & 4: deal with the original purpose of the bill.
Section 3: places a restriction on combination of licenses.
Section 4: creates an exception to Section 3 for existing
licensees. It also allows for transfer of licenses.
Number 205
CHAIRMAN SHARP asked if subsection (i) in Section 4 would not allow
people with brewery licenses to get a restaurant beer and wine
license and open an establishment in Fairbanks.
MR. FORD replied the idea is that if you have a rule saying you
cannot have this combination, with an exception for those who
already are licensed, then what happens as far as additional
brewery or restaurant licenses, beyond those that already exist?
Can they be obtained, or not? This simply specifies that they
cannot. This addresses whether those with existing licenses could
obtain a second license. It's up to the committee to decide
whether they like that or not. It sets a finite limit on the
number of these types of licenses.
MR. FORD continued the sectional analysis.
Section 5: provision to recapture an increase in value of
grandfathered combination licenses. The state will get a
percentage of the increased value of the sale of those licenses.
Section 6: applicability.
Number 240
MR. FORD stated the committee has an amendment that would allow a
person to get an additional license. The committee can decide
whether or not they want a licensee to be able to get an additional
license. There is another amendment which would raise the amount
allowed to be sold for off premises consumption to 5 gallons.
Number 255
CHAIRMAN SHARP commented that if they stay at 2.5 gallons, the only
containers available for transport would be in gallon or half
gallon bottles, which have screw-caps and can be drunk out of as
soon as the purchaser gets in the car. He would like to leave the
amount at 5 gallons, because that is a keg, and would not usually
be tapped in a car.
SENATOR RANDY PHILLIPS made a motion to adopt the amendment raising
that amount from 2.5 gallons to 5 gallons.
CHAIRMAN SHARP, hearing no objection, stated the amendment was
adopted.
CHAIRMAN SHARP asked Mr. Ford to explain amendment G.1
MR. FORD responded amendment G.1 would take the opposite approach
of the draft. Instead of restricting a person to their existing
licenses, they would be able to get more licenses.
SENATOR RANDY PHILLIPS asked if the amendment would take away from
the original intent of the legislation.
MR. FORD replied it would seem to do so, if the intent is to limit
these kinds of combinations.
SENATOR DUNCAN asked if someone new could get into the business, if
they don't currently have one of these license combinations.
MR. FORD responded they could not.
SENATOR DUNCAN stated, then SB 314 would just grandfather in
existing licenses, and wouldn't allow any new ones, not even in
other parts of the state outside Anchorage.
MR. FORD replied that is correct. They couldn't do it as a
combination. The Alaska Brewing Company couldn't get a restaurant
beer and wine license under this bill.
SENATOR DUNCAN asked what they could do.
MR. FORD responded they will only be able to operate as a brewery.
They couldn't get a beverage dispensary license or a package store
license either.
SENATOR DUNCAN asked, then the Alaska Brewing Company couldn't come
downtown and set up a little brewery operation and serve food also.
MR. FORD replied, no.
CHAIRMAN SHARP asked if the amendment, if passed, would allow them,
or anyone else with a brewery and restaurant license to open one up
in Fairbanks.
MR. FORD responded, if that person already had a brewery and
restaurant license, the amendment would allow them to get another
license. It would allow them to get four, five, ten more, or
whatever.
CHAIRMAN SHARP asked if under current law licensees are prohibited
from owning multiple licenses.
MR. FORD responded it is only prohibited for certain types of
licenses, but not for restaurant or eating place licenses. Under
this bill, that would be illegal though.
CHAIRMAN SHARP stated SB 314 would restrict brew-pubs to Anchorage,
and no where else.
MR. FORD responded that is correct. You could have a brew-pub, but
not a restaurant and a brewery. You would have to have a beverage
dispensary license.
SENATOR DUNCAN stated the ones in Anchorage brew, sell beer, and
food, and that wouldn't be able to occur any where else in the
state under SB 314.
MR. FORD replied that is correct.
Number 330
SENATOR DUNCAN asked why they would want to shut down this type of
business.
SENATOR RANDY PHILLIPS responded because George Malekos thinks it
is an unfair level of competition against his business. Mr.
Malekos has spent several hundred thousand dollars for his
licenses, while these types of businesses have only spent $1,600.00
for their licenses. The entry fee is not level for basically the
same type of business. That's where the argument is.
SENATOR DUNCAN asked if they were really doing the same thing
though, because Mr. Malekos has a liquor license.
CHAIRMAN SHARP stated that Mr. Malekos got involved in it before
the ABC Board allowed the waiver on the 50% food - 50% booze
requirement. That's what opened the window on the brew-pub without
a liquor license.
SENATOR RANDY PHILLIPS stated there are a few other businesses in
his district that feel the same way as Mr. Malekos.
CHAIRMAN SHARP stated that during testimony at the last hearing,
two people supported SB 314 while twelve people opposed it. He has
a problem with no one else being able to start one of these types
of establishments. Not even the people being grandfathered in can
start one in Fairbanks. That's one of the reasons he had amendment
G.1 drawn up: it would at least allow some expansion to other
towns.
SENATOR DUNCAN stated amendment G.1 would allow expansion to other
towns, but it would also allow expansion in Anchorage.
SENATOR RANDY PHILLIPS stated that would defeat the original intent
of the bill.
CHAIRMAN SHARP asked if the amendment would open it up.
MR. FORD replied it opens it up for those people who are
grandfathered in.
SENATOR DUNCAN stated that bothered him. Why shouldn't they allow
the Alaskan Brewery to open a brew-pub in Juneau, if they so
desire? He asked if there was some way to put a limit on it,
perhaps by population?
MR. FORD stated there are a number of restrictions in law based
upon population. You could certainly use that as a limiting
factor.
CHAIRMAN SHARP asked Mr. Ford to give them a conceptual amendment
using population as a limiting factor.
Number 390
MR. FORD thinks they don't want amendment G.1 or Sections 3 and 4
in that case. You won't be dealing with grand-fathering, what you
will do is specify there can't be any more than a certain number of
these licenses per certain population. Pick a number that allows
the people who would have been grandfathered to continue to
operate, and also would allow these business to operate in other
areas of the state, if they so choose.
CHAIRMAN SHARP commented if they set the population number too
high, then the smaller communities wouldn't be able to have this
type of a business.
SENATOR DUNCAN asked if they couldn't simply specify a population
of "x" or less? You could specify that one license is allowed for
a community with a population of 50,000 or less.
MR. FORD stated you could do it however you want.
SENATOR RANDY PHILLIPS stated you wouldn't want to pick a number
that would exclude any of the businesses already in the process of
opening.
SENATOR DUNCAN stated he is willing to let the bill move from
committee with a conceptual amendment on that.
CHAIRMAN SHARP suggested specifying no more than one license per
30,000 of population or less. Allow one license up to 30,000, then
after that, no more than one license for every additional 30,000 of
population or partial of.
MR. FORD gave an example: if a community had a population of
31,000, they could have two brew-pubs.
SENATOR DUNCAN added, if a community had a population of 28,000,
they could have one.
MR. FORD responded that would be correct.
SENATOR RANDY PHILLIPS wanted the committee to understand what
triggered the problem in the first place. He doesn't think it's
fair that some people had to pay so much for a similar type of
business. That's where the problem started.
SENATOR DUNCAN asked if he understood: Mr. Malekos doesn't want any
more competition.
CHAIRMAN SHARP responded Mr. Malekos had to buy a liquor dispensary
license for $200,000.00 to be in the same business as these other
guys.
SENATOR DUNCAN asked Senator Phillips if he wanted to close Snow
Goose down.
SENATOR RANDY PHILLIPS replied, no. But Mr. Malekos wants the
playing field to be level in the future. Senator Phillips stated
he agrees with Mr. Malekos.
CHAIRMAN SHARP commented he would like to see at least one brew-pub
in his town. He asked if the committee can approve the conceptual
amendment.
CHAIRMAN SHARP, hearing no objection, stated a conceptual amendment
that allows one combination license for up to 30,000 population,
and additional licenses for each 30,000 or less of additional
population was adopted.
SENATOR RANDY PHILLIPS asked a question that was indiscernible.
MR. FORD responded it would apply to either.
SENATOR DUNCAN asked if Sitka could have one of these types of
businesses under this amendment.
MR. FORD replied they could have a business with one of these
combination licenses.
CHAIRMAN SHARP stated the ABC Board will be reviewing the licensing
structures during the interim to come up with recommendations on
this, since they opened up this can of worms.
SENATOR RANDY PHILLIPS stated they helped by passing the law.
CHAIRMAN SHARP asked if he could have a motion to move SB 314.
Number 450
SENATOR RANDY PHILLIPS made a motion to discharge SB 314, with the
conceptual amendment, from the Senate State Affairs Committee with
individual recommendations.
CHAIRMAN SHARP, hearing no objection, stated SB 314 was discharged
from the Senate State Affairs Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|